Today there was a minimally inspirational OMT lecture on ENT (sinusitis, otitis media, allergic rhinitis). The material was so repetitive it was hypnotic. I became my exasperated, insubordinate self. I could have given the same damn lecture and workshop- myofascial release of the thoracic inlet, cervical soft tissue, OA release, condylar decompression, sinus effleurage, lymphatic pump (upper thoracic and diaphragm doming). The one technique I didn’t remember was massaging the jaw to help the eustachian tube to drain. What is wrong with telling a story about patients who found this helpful?? Isn’t that why you’re a DO? So you actually use these techniques on patients that need it, right? Why not share some patient stories!!!!! I have multiple theories why this is not the case:
1) The DO does not actually use these techniques and just had to give a lecture
2) He was not bright enough to include the stories
3) He thought the stories were not “scientific”
4) He thought WE might think the stories were not scientific
So far, 4 out of 4 of my classmates learn better when taught by “I had a patient who…” rather than “The scientific studies show…” Stories (aka anecdotal evidence) has its place in education.
Then this evening I went to a more informal discussion where we were read some of AT Still’s work for the purpose of discussing it. Of course, I was the only one who actually read it. The discussion took on numerous direction other than what I wanted, which were stories of using OMT to help patients. The group consisted of myself, 3 residents and one young attending DO, so the depth of experience was limited. It ended up being more of a venting session or talking about energy rather than anatomy and even about less AT Still. When the residents left I stayed and talked with the attending because I had a lot to say. Unfortunately, he did not have much to say that was helpful or enlightening. I thank him tremendously for having these discussions and giving me a little outlet and another opinion. Bless his heart.
For the last 2 years I have been thinking about OMT in the beginning vs. OMT today and no one has yet to give me an adequate answer regarding why the huge difference, why DOs are not “Meccas” for the sick like Kirksville was, why the prominent “ten fingered” DOs are more concerned about their subjective feelings rather than with the anatomy of the patient and why would these DOs send a patient to their PCP because of a suspected thyroid problem rather than treating the thyroid with OMT???? There’s a patient on the psych ward who has hyperthyroidism and I wish I was working with a competent DO who would treat him with OMT. I’ll be damned if I ever ask to treat a pysch patient with OMT in the hospital!! That would be so inappropriate, but I think about it…